Why Books Don’t Need Pages

By MCM

Posted July 23, 2009

795 words

Support the author of this article by liking it on Facebook!

Why Books Don’t Need Pages

This will into things a lot of people won’t care about, but some will care very passionately about.  It’s the future of books, and more specifically, the technical and UI considerations of how pages work in eBooks.

The thing that got me was this post on the always-exciting eBook Test.  In particular, this bit:

For example, while held in landscape mode, an eBook reader could display two pages, side-by-side, just like this current online software at The Internet Archive:

Now, The eBook Test is a very forward-thinking place, with lots of great ideas about the future of books, but in this regard, they feel strangely behind the times.  Look at it this way: writing used to happen on scrolls, right?  It’s like if someone invented the bound book, and said “we must write all the content with the binding at the top, down through the pages, to better simulate the reading experience we’re used to”.  It’s silly, and it makes no sense.  We’re talking about a dramatically changed medium, and we should be embracing it.  But how?

Forget pages

This is one of the things that bothers me most about ebooks.  We’re doing massive amounts of work to create artificial pagination which will never stack up to a properly-typeset page, to what end?  So people find it familiar?  People read emails onscreen, in one long stream.  They read blog posts the same way.  People are used to non-paginated content.  In fact, when you’re reading a post on  a site and it’s broken into multiple pages you need to click through, doesn’t it ANNOY you that someone is obviously misunderstanding the conventions of the web?  Like it was designed by old-media nutters who refused to accept the world had changed?

Forget pages.  They’re useless.  Relics.  They don’t provide any benefit, and they destroy any semblance of quality design.  Make page breaks according to thematic shifts, not because of an arbitrary word count.  Pages of a picture book?  Sure, that’s fair.  Pages of a novel?  Why?

The major complaint of this system is that it’s easy to forget where you were when you were reading.  Fair enough, but easily fixed.  I added a little javascript to my Reader site that records the reader’s scroll position as they read.  Bookmark the result and revisit, and you are automatically put back exactly where you were.  It’s better than a page.  You pick up exactly where you left off.  A reader can read all the way through the chapter without an artificial page shift — and believe me, every page you ask them to flip is a chance they’ll decide to come back later — and thusly, we’re moving the exit decision to chapters, not pages.  We’re buying more time to convince the reader to stay.

Look at the idea of a side-by-side presentation.  Reading in columns.  Again: why?  How does that improve the experience?  How often do you look at a printed book wide open, just to see the two facing pages at the same time?  To appreciate that they exist?  Or do you read the one page, then switch to the next, then turn the page?  You’re reading within the columns.  The columns are a limitation of the medium, not a feature.  If I used Windows, I wouldn’t be using it for the Blue Screen of Death.  That’s insane.  Trying to recreate the flaws of one medium into the next makes so little sense, you’d think it was coming from the RIAA.

Look: short of a standard pixel size for all ebook screens, you can never really know how your content is going to fit.  So you’re left with a certain amount of guesswork, but certainly no more than the web has already overcome.  Focus on making your books make sense in the medium.  Design them appropriately, design them beautifully, and forget the old ways of doing things.

I remember designing sites ten years ago, being told: “We have to make sure it prints well!” and cutting back on our techniques to match.  These days, we have sites that are so fundamentally un-printable that they’re truly amazing to behold.  But you know what?  That’s GOOD.  We’ve started designing for the medium at hand, and it means there are some gorgeous sites out there.

We need to do the same with ebooks.  We need to break free of the paper mindset, enhance the capabilities of epub (giving it proper rendering capabilities for a change) and replace old-school typographers with web designers.  We’re not talking about paper books, or websites either.  We’re talking about ebooks, and they need the attention they deserve.  We need to do something new, something amazing, something that says “this is what an ebook is”.

About MCM

MCM is the creator of the animated series RollBots. He also writes books, such as The Vector, The Pig and the Box, and Typhoon. When not doing such things, he is coding sites like this one. He is also insane.
  • http://n3wt0n.com/ Kyle Newton

    Finally! Yes! Less focus on keeping with tradition and more on working with the technology at hand.

    This is relevant to so much more than just books.

    • http://1889.ca MCM

      I remember when the iPhone’s dev kit just came out, and everyone was getting so excited about the flipping and pinching features, and every app that came out was using those things extensively… a perfect example of embracing the technology at hand. Why we don’t do it more often, I don’t know. Legacy constraints are stupid to begin with, but actively seeking them out is just lunacy.

  • kdnewton

    Finally! Yes! Less focus on keeping with tradition and more on working with the technology at hand.

    This is relevant to so much more than just books.

  • http://1889.ca MCM

    I remember when the iPhone's dev kit just came out, and everyone was getting so excited about the flipping and pinching features, and every app that came out was using those things extensively… a perfect example of embracing the technology at hand. Why we don't do it more often, I don't know. Legacy constraints are stupid to begin with, but actively seeking them out is just lunacy.

  • http://piershollott.blogspot.com piers_hollott

    Seriously, though, I was reading *The Vector* last night, and found myself flipping ahead to see how much I had left to read, because it was late. And I do this with books too, but in a different way. Your chapters are fairly short, so I can just look at the scroll bar to get a sense of how long I have to keep my brain functioning, but, people naturally push back when the scroll bar becomes too long, as it becomes less functional in this context.

    A book reader could conceivably track how long it takes me to read a certain number of words, and actually guess how much time is left in a chapter. Which would probably be completely useless, but my point is, a book can’t do this. Unless it’s haunted by Lord Voldemort or something.

    Honestly, I believe a lot of the attachment people have to books stems from our relationship with the sun and the way we respond to radiation. As more readers are built with non-reflective screens, reading on readers will become a more comfortable process.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Piers-Hollott/687830055 Piers Hollott

    Seriously, though, I was reading *The Vector* last night, and found myself flipping ahead to see how much I had left to read, because it was late. And I do this with books too, but in a different way. Your chapters are fairly short, so I can just look at the scroll bar to get a sense of how long I have to keep my brain functioning, but, people naturally push back when the scroll bar becomes too long, as it becomes less functional in this context.

    A book reader could conceivably track how long it takes me to read a certain number of words, and actually guess how much time is left in a chapter. Which would probably be completely useless, but my point is, a book can't do this. Unless it's haunted by Lord Voldemort or something.

    Honestly, I believe a lot of the attachment people have to books stems from our relationship with the sun and the way we respond to radiation. As more readers are built with non-reflective screens, reading on readers will become a more comfortable process.

  • kdnewton

    Finally! Yes! Less focus on keeping with tradition and more on working with the technology at hand.

    This is relevant to so much more than just books.

  • http://1889.ca MCM

    I remember when the iPhone's dev kit just came out, and everyone was getting so excited about the flipping and pinching features, and every app that came out was using those things extensively… a perfect example of embracing the technology at hand. Why we don't do it more often, I don't know. Legacy constraints are stupid to begin with, but actively seeking them out is just lunacy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Piers-Hollott/687830055 Piers Hollott

    Seriously, though, I was reading *The Vector* last night, and found myself flipping ahead to see how much I had left to read, because it was late. And I do this with books too, but in a different way. Your chapters are fairly short, so I can just look at the scroll bar to get a sense of how long I have to keep my brain functioning, but, people naturally push back when the scroll bar becomes too long, as it becomes less functional in this context.

    A book reader could conceivably track how long it takes me to read a certain number of words, and actually guess how much time is left in a chapter. Which would probably be completely useless, but my point is, a book can't do this. Unless it's haunted by Lord Voldemort or something.

    Honestly, I believe a lot of the attachment people have to books stems from our relationship with the sun and the way we respond to radiation. As more readers are built with non-reflective screens, reading on readers will become a more comfortable process.

  • Pingback: 4 Day Digest « Metrocascade – The Blog

All content released under a Creative Commons license unless otherwise noted.

MERGE Losing Freight Losing Freight Camelot: Unbound

Want to be notified about new books, great deals and promotional offers?